mercoledì 28 aprile 2010

Why science?



Why science? This one and other questions were asked to 24 italian students aged 14-18 from a professional school during a discussion that took 2 hours. Here the results of this first investigation.

Why science?

Students answered individually to this question and then discussed their personal assertions with classmates.

- Science is dull.
- Science sometimes is boring, but is useful.
- Science is interesting.
- Science is a little bit complicated.
- Science is fascinating, but when science is explained it loses the appeal because the scientific language is too technical and gloomy.
- Science is useful to understand facts around us.
- Science is useful to discover "life".
- Science generates new forms of life.
- Science is helpful, because medicine save people.
- Many people think that, coming to this school, science isn't useful, however it's helpful for our future.
- To study science only for two years (as in our school) isn't profitable.
- In science experiments are made. Experiments are neutral. Scientists determine if the consequences of their experiments are negative or positive.

Does science affect your daily life? In which way?

Students answered to this and following questions collectively. They elaborated the answers working in small groups.

- Not always.
- Science concerns every activity we do: cell phone, television, light.
- In some cases, science help us to "translate" the facts that happen every day.
- Science affects our life 24 hours a day starting from the simplest gesture we do.

Does science affect your scholastic life? In which way?


- We think not. But perhaps science affects our scholastic life without knowing.
- Science affects our scholastic life through atmospheric phenomenons that allow us to go or not to go to school.
- Yes sometimes, but above all when we study.
- Indipendently from the scholastic subjects, science is present in every activity we do at school, e.g. when we use the computer or when we have a coffee.

Do you think that science could affect your future job? In which way?

- No.
- Yes, it depends on the kind of job and on the position.
- Yes, because in many jobs science is the main element.
- Yes, when people take a scientific branch.

Do you think that science could affect your future life?


- Yes, because science will be helpful when we use technology.
- Yes, e.g. when we will drive a car, use domestic appliances, cook or asssist children.
- Yes, because if we encontered problems, science could be helpful. A ten years old girl, in 2004 when a tsunami hit southeast Asia coasts, saved many lives because she knew the dynamics of tsunami.

Do you think that science has a positive role in society? Why?


- Yes. If science didn't exist, the world wouldn't progress.
- Yes, because all our actions are concerned with science.
- Yes and no, because science could be positive, but also negative. E.g., humans can use science to create tools that damage humanity or that provoke wars. This isn't the fault of science, but is the fault of humans who are not able to utilize correctly their knowledge or are not able to utilize this common good (knowledge).

Do you think that science has a negative role in society? Why?


- No, because science allows society to progress in all fields.
- No. The world revolves around science and, also if sometimes it's boring, we can't ignore it.

Do you think that the scientific knowledge has to be a right for everybody? Why?


- Yes. Actually, every italian student has the opportunity to learn science in every school.
- Yes. Every student has the right to know science.
- Yes, because people in this way can increase their lexical and culture.
- Yes, we have the right and the duty to know the thing around us.

Do you think that scientific knowledge has to be a duty? Why?

- Actually science is a duty only at school.
- Science mustn't be imposed, but people should understand its importance.
- Actually science isn't a duty, but it's a choice that one make to know more.

Do you think that scientific knowledge concernes only some kind of people?

- No, because we, all, have to know the most important issues in our life.
- No, as already said, knowledge has to be a right for everybody.
- No, it concerns everybody because scientific knowledge increases our knowledge.
- No, it concerns everybody. To know is a right for everybody, as it's written in the Italian Constitution.

You studied science at school since you were 8. In which moments did you appreciate to learn science?


- When we went to planetarium, when we watch documentary films, when we study on maps, when we participated in a project about sexuality.
- It was very interesting to study masculine and feminine genitals, the gravity, the universe and minerals. We think that it would be opportune that science was explained in a more fluide way, making also experiments.
- Everything we do is bound to a unique big sphere: science. The study of science is of vital importance. For this reason the Italian Government allows every student to learn it. Science isn't a "light" subject and asks engagement and a lot of time. Science is certainly a fascinating subject that allow us to know the why of everything: why things work, why some phenomenons happen..


You studied science at school since you were 8. In which moments didn't you appreciate to learn science?


- When science is unclear, when the teacher doesn't explain well, when the language of the book is too complex.
- Subject we appreciated less are cells and oceanic crust.
- Science is a complex matter. This is certainly a clear invitation to forget it. In fact to learn science is one of the most complicated existing things. It's full of abbreviations, complicated words and uses a own language that can put a student on the spot.


Thanks to Veronica, Luca, Adrea, Lisa, Ferhat, Lorenzo, Matteo, Federica, Silvana, Alice, Tahmina, Rihab, Sara, Veronica, Yollande... students at Istituto Professionale per i Servizi Turistici e Commerciali "C. Macrelli" in Cesena

lunedì 26 aprile 2010

Towards the building of a permanent European group of thoughts



April 14th 9 am: GENERAL INTRODUCTION by Jacques Perriault 30'

April 14th 9.30 am/1.30 pm – Axis One
WHAT CHANGES, TRANSFORMATIONS OR MUTATIONS COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND RESEARCH ON BRAIN DO INTRODUCE IN THE WORLD OF LEARNING?
Animator : Elie Faroult
Speaker : Michel Imbert Discutant/Moderator : Dominique Lestel
Round Table : Daniel Andler (Compas Group), Bernard Stiegler (Ars Industrialis)

April 14th 2.30 pm -5.30 pm – Axis Two
THE SOCIO-COGNITIVE POTENTIALITIES OF DIGITAL WORLD
Animator : Thierry Gaudin
Speaker : Serge Tisseron Discutant/Moderator : Sylvie Craipeau.
Round Table : Fabien Fenouillet, Elena Pasquinelli (Compas Group)

April 15th 9.30 am/12.30 am - Axis Three
ABOUT PUBLIC POLICIES ON “DIGITAL ISSUES”: ANALYSIS AND CRITICS
Animator : Laurence Favier
Speaker : Xavier Dalloz Discutant/Moderator : Yannick Landais
Round table: Dominique Cardon, Dominique Lacroix

April 15th 2 pm/5 pm – Ais Four
THE 21st CENTURY PLACES OF MEMORY
Animator : Jacques Perriault
Speaker: Ghislaine Azémard Discutant/Moderator: Norbert Paquel
Round table: Elisabeth Caillet, Girolamo Ramunni, André Malicot

April 15th 7 pm/9 pm: aperitif/discussion
ABOUT A PERMANENT EUROPEAN SEMINAR AND THE STRENGTHENING OF GROUP

April 16th 9.30 am/12.30 am – Axis Five
GENDER ISSUES IN KNOWLEDGE AND TRANSMISSION
Animaor: Lionel Larqué
Speaker: Brigitte Chapelain Discutant/Moderator: Louisa Prista
Round table: Marie-Anne Delahaut, Daniele Rousseau

April 16th 2 pm/5 pm – Axis Six
SYNTHESIS ROUND TABLE ABOUT FUTURE INITIATIVE
With: Daniel Andler et Elena Pasquinelli, Elie Faroult, Jacques Perriault, Thierry Gaudin, Clarisse Herrenschmidt, Lionel Larqué, and members of YPSSI network.

What do knowledge and transmission mean today?



From 2010 April 14th to April 16th 2010, a European seminar related to contemporary issues in knowledge and knowledge transmission will take place in Cité Internationale of Paris, launched and directed by Group 38.
The Group 38 was initiated by French association “Les Petits Débrouillards” in 2008 during the French Presidency of European Union in order to follow and strengthen a project that aimed to generate analysis, critics and recommendations from young European citizen from all European countries towards European institution (mainly European commission and Ministers of research).
The Group 38 is actually composed by European experts and scientists. The Group 38 has decided in June 2009 to contribute and to stimulate analysis, thoughts and even research about actual relations between science and society issues,focused on young people topics.
We, as some members of this group, have developed what we could call a “double-question”: is the digital world inevitable? Do we enter into a dynamic and “logic” of social and cognitive prosthesis? Social prosthesis because we could substitute to the “social presence of human beings” a “logic” of “social networks”; socio-cognitive prosthesis when we begin to search on Google without knowing precisely what we are searching.
This societal debate firstly affects the young people in one hand, education and transmission processes on the other hand. This is a difficult debate because young people never knew the “world before digital times”, that digital times are part of their realities et that older people can be seen by them as “has-been”. To keep clear ideas and analysis in these matters is difficult.
This is why the proposition of building a space of thoughts bringing together young and older people, experts, scientists and practitioners seem very useful for us, if it could be permanent and not only a one-shot initiative. We have to contribute to a permanent updating of the science/techniques/society interactions. More, one day, young people will be old et will have to face a younger generation born with mobile phone at the age of 10. This implicates to think about the actual tendency of focusing “technological dimensions” of the debate and to go back to foundations such as communication, information analysis and connected notions and concepts. Many young people ignore these notions when they provide theoretical substrates to understand actual evolutions without being hypnotized by digital worlds and fairies.
Thus, we invite you to a dynamic reflexive seminar. This exploratory seminar will not be centred on “digital issues” but must be understood as a seminar which uses digital issues to help us to re-interrogate major questions: transmission and knowledge issues,
intergenerational links on educative and transmission issues, the necessary strengthening of skills and competencies, know-how of young generations.
More, the question of transmission is very specific in front of demographic reality of our societies, where ageing imposes to anticipate risks and consequences older generations did not face.
This is the main objective that this seminar want to explore: to outline how such a collective reflection could be done and managed, thanks to a platform opened to researchers, leaders, decision-makers social and educative movements interested in youth issues.